Evaluating historical views of leadership Evaluating historical views of leadership Over the years, leadership has evolved through three major phases, namely trait, behavioural, and situational.
Each of these phases comprises of various characteristics, styles, and attributes that differentiate between effective and bad leaders. Trait theories hold that leaders are born, while behavioural theories argue that leaders learn through experiences and observations.
In contrast, situational theories observe that leaders change styles to fit the immediate situation.
Despite these differences, the theories share some features about leadership. Commonalities and Disparities of Views on Leadership The commonalities among views of Vaughn, Eerkens, and KanterWrenand Weber lie in the definition of leadership.
They describe leadership as the process by which an individual influences others towards attaining either group or organizational goals. This definition emphasizes leadership as a social influence process, which does not exist without a leader or followers.
In addition, it emphasizes voluntary actions of followers. The authors argue that this voluntary nature of followership is the distinguishing factor between leadership and other influential types of formal authority. Leadership results in purposeful and goal-oriented followership behaviours in any kind of organized setting.
While leadership has been extensively studied in organizational sciences, the three main theoretical frameworks dominating studies include the trait theories from s to sbehavioural approach from s to s and contingency or situational approaches s to s.
Various authors differ in their historical views about leadership. According to Wrenthe Great Man theory holds that people who are born to lead have necessary innate characteristics, such as social kills, intelligence, charisma, and confidence.
These skills make leaders to be naturally born. Wren notes that trait theories assume inherent capacity of leaders, portraying them as heroic, mythic, or destined leaders, who display their leadership traits when they are most needed.
These theories were used when leadership was mainly male dominated especially in military leadership. Wren adds that early research on leadership focussed on already successful leaders, such as aristocratic leaders who achieved their positions through inheritance.
Individuals in lower social status had few opportunities to achieve or practice leadership roles, leading to the idea of leadership as an inherent ability. According to Wrengreat men are societal products whose actions would be impossible in the absence of social conditions built before their time.
Weber explores different leadership styles, with more emphasis on evolution of leadership theories.
|Meredith Simmons Running head:|
|The process of evaluation includes an examination of the commonalities and disparities between these views of leadership. The paper explores a definition of modern military leadership.|
The author asserts that following the Great Man theory was the behavioural theories. These theories hypothesize that people learn leadership through observations and experiences.
In addition, the behavioural characteristics or personality traits are inherent in families and are genetically passed from one generation to another. However, inability of these theories to explain certain attitudes of leaders led scholars to focus on actions of individuals that nurture leadership qualities in others.
The result was contingency theories, which held the view that leadership styles are contingent on factors, such as the quality of followers, the situation, and other variables.
They hold that there is no precise method to lead because both internal and external environmental factors require leaders to adapt to particular situations.
The theories also posit that while leadership did not change, the dynamics, personnel, and the environment changed. Weber notes that situational theories that later evolved to argue that there is no better leadership style, as these styles can be either effective or ineffective depending on a situation.
They argue that different leadership styles are more appropriate for various decision-making that affect followers.Here is the best resource for homework help with LDR A: Leadership Theories and Practice at University Of Phoenix.
Find LDRA study guides, notes, and Find Study Resources. Main Menu; by School Analyzing and Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership Paper Final Draft. 6 pages. Week 3 Analyzing and Evaluating Historical Views of. Whatever personal views arise after reviewing these masterworks there are some truths furthering the argument that leadership theory is an ever evolving door and a melting pot of ideas derived from many figures throughout history.
The process of evaluating historical aspects of leadership involved critically analyzing the commonalities and disparities among a group of influential leaders, such as Thomas Carlyle, Mohandas Gandhi, Niccolo Machiavelli and W.E.B Du Bois. Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership The process of this evaluation involved an analysis of the commonalities and disparities among a group of leaders, which were largely influenced by the times in . Running head: EVALUATING HISTORICAL VIEWS OF LEADERSHIP 1 Evaluating Historical Views to Leadership EVALUATING HISTORICAL VIEWS OF LEADERSHIP 2 Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership The process of this evaluation involved an analysis of the commonalities and disparities among a group of leaders, which were largely influenced by the times in which they lived.
Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership March 9, University of Phoenix Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership This paper evaluates the leadership views of Plato, Aristotle, Lao-Tzu, and Machiavelli from the point of view .
RE: LDR A Analyzing and Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership WEEK 3 Do You need help with your school? Visit timberdesignmag.com to learn about the great services I offer for students like you.
I Can write your papers, do your presentations, labs, and final exams too. Evaluating historical views of leadership Over the years, leadership has evolved through three major phases, namely trait, behavioural, and situational.
Each of these phases comprises of various characteristics, styles, and attributes that differentiate between effective and bad leaders. Analyzing and Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership Paper. Develop an analytical framework containing three to five categories that you deem important to successful leadership based upon the various historical leadership models we have read about in Weeks 1?